|
TTFAFF (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm afraid you are right, sir. Federer would lose to Nadal just because Nadal is Nadal, that's why the H2H is so lame against Nadal '-' And yes, he also has a little problem when starting the second set after winning the first... If he's won the first set, he will always have a lot of troubles to start the second, even loses his serve really early sometimes... But he is still Federer and I love him *.*
Sleevinn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hahah funny because roddick beat federer lol
contactafc10 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Federer has mental problems, always had. He´d lose to Nadal just because Nadal had beaten him the last time they played. He has a lot of frights. Federer always has trouble holding serve after breaking, always has problems serving for sets and especially matches.Ive seen a million times Federer losing serve when needing to win, million times?Sampras never lost serve in those situations, never.
contactafc10 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
its sooooo true!!! Roddicks groundtrokes land in the middle of the court, his forehand is so weak, he just wants to stay in the point, what is he doing? does he think he´s gonna win matches this way??Where is his 2003-2004 agression, his ferocious forehand??
BigLAmericanDream (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
2012: Who said Roddick was done!?
MYHEARTMUTMINI10 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hahaha great comment!!
minskdynamo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Moreover, the end of his career? You're kidding, right? Federer just smoked through a Masters 1000 event, and had one bad day at the office in losing to a guy playing in top form. Let's see if Roddick can survive the next round. It's a tennis match. One break is all it takes to lose a match, and anyone can lose to anyone. Was it the end of Djokovic's career when he lost to Nishikori last year? How about when Nadal lost to Dodig? Fed played badly and Roddick played great. That's it.
minskdynamo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Surely you're kidding. He didn't lose to him twice in a row. The exhibition in MSG was just that. An exhibition. I was there, Federer wasn't running for balls, was attempting crazy shots, and was generally half-assing the whole match. He was letting Roddick play in front of a home crowd and having a fun time. Roddick knows this. You should too. This last match was very close, and Federer only had a crushing second set. Roddick served lights out and held on. It almost never happens.
TTFAFF (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
After Basel 2010 I remember I said that if Federer ever lost to Roddick again that would be the end of his career. I thought people were going to hate me because of that but I actually got 30 thumbs up or something. Well, Federer has lost two in a row for Roddick, what can I say now? What does it mean? I just hope I was wrong.
TTFAFF (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Roddick just beat Federer for the second time in a rown |
